Here is a list of various interpretations of the title of the new Laibach album WAT. These interpretations have been submitted by Laibach funs and they are not the official Laibach interpretation of the enigmatic acronym. Soon Laibach will give an answer to the one big question that has possessed our minds:

Here is a list of various interpretations of the title of the new Laibach album WAT. These interpretations have been submitted by Laibach funs and they are not the official Laibach interpretation of the enigmatic acronym. Soon Laibach will give an answer to the one big question that has possessed our minds:

War Against Terrorism
This was the answer that most of the funs gave us. A very good interpretation that even Laibach liked a lot.

Whatever Anybody Thinks
Submitted by Vasco (Greece)

Weight, Altitude, Temperature (the factors determining take-off performance)
Wireless Action Team (military)
Web Action Time (used by NASA)
Submitted by RedSpy (Greece)

Weapons and Tactics
Submitted by Donald Campbell

Wirtschaft Arbeit Technology
We Akropola Transnationalists
We achieve transmission!
Wagnerian Art Tempest
Submitted by simon van leeuwen (www.pravdaDa.org)

Weapons of American Terrorism
Submitted by Aurora Shelton (www.society.spacia.org)

Wired Alcoholic Tyrant,
Wild Angry Travellers
Submitted by Klaus Slaughter

War Added Tax
Warten auf Tanzfest
Wandering Around Trbovlje

Submitted by Zlato Krec

WAT about Totalitarism?
Welt am Tiefpunkt
War across Theaters
When America Tumbles
Submited by Thomas Richter

I know that I don't know what is WAT.
If I know this, so I know that this interpretation is false or true but, as strange as it seems, I will do it. So, I deduce that I know something about. WAT because I know something about LAIBACH. WAT is LAIBACH ? Yes! I identify WAT as LAIBACH. When I say, I know, this means that this is not me but rather the object I that I create in me. I is Me. But Me is not necessarily the I, because it is an object which is mine. What is an object? An object is something like a missile. It always knows where it should go because it knows where it is not. And when it arrives at the place where it must go, it doesn’t know this because it is the precise moment where the missile disintegrates. The object is like a missile: it knows what it is and what it is not. From these two points, as they create a dimension or a space or anything you want, the object disappears at the precise moment it becomes me (When I will listen WAT), it does not pertain to LAIBACH but to ME.So, in few words: LAIBACH, it is ME in the way that LAIBACH chooses to cross the line as I do it; henceforth when you cross a line in its two dimensions, the dimensions and the line disappear. Anything disintegrates, only remains something we call emotion, namely love or hate.And the object appears once again, with a different aspect but it remains the same with a transformation that allows it to keep its existence from disintegration. Oh my goodness, once again, I give life to something which has not life!... Let Wat is Wat is the only thing known.References of this text are available upon self search; when you find a reference try to give it a question: is it a real reference or do you find this referencebecause it tells you something? Each expression is a reference to another expression which is made by words that both of us use with our own/now/wonstory to create a history which is an endless end. But remember history is mystory that people transforms into mystery, and so forth... Frequently asked questions
-Is WAT a fascism? Firstly, you should ask yourself why you need such a question to find a double answer: is it yes? Is it no? Why you put such a question? Is it to find an answer or another question?
-Is WAT art? Is god art?
-Is WAT believes in god? God believes in WAT.
-Is WAT a politics? To transform some thing you need what bothers the social human being.
-Is WAT poetry? As long as love is poetry in motion.
By jean-marc juin. For the nsk state.
Have a nice day, everyday. Best Wishes.

Obviously, WAT is not a misspelled What nor is it standing for something, because then it would be written as W.A.T. To be a shortening for something is not a good idea, because it could stand for million of meanings. Thus, we look on the numeric code of WAT, finding 23-1-20 Thus, we are sure, it is Genesis 23:1-20. Let me quote:

“Life of Abraham, Part 3
Genesis 23:1-20
Solomon wrote, "A good name is better than precious ointment; and the day of death, than the day of one's birth." (Ecc. 7:1) The point

was not that it is better to die than to be born. Rather that we are given a name at birth that is like a fragrant ointment and that we should keep it that way until we die. At birth no one knew what we would make of our name, but at death our name will either be fragrant or putrid. Consider names of individuals like Judas Iscariot, Pontius Pilate, Adolf Hitler, etc. These names were given at birth filled with hope and promise. We are talking about the testimony of our lives. When a person with a good name dies, the day of death is better than the day of birth and folks will rejoice over their lives. Over the last several weeks we have studied the life of Abraham and Sarah. Now we come to end of their lives. We have learned from them how to live by faith, and now we will see what it means to die in faith. Tonight we will look at the death of a princess. Sarah had her faults, as we all do, but God called her a princess. She had been a good wife to Abraham and a good mother to Isaac. She is included in God's 'hall of faith' in Hebrews eleven, Peter named her as a good example for Christian wives to follow, and Paul used her to illustrate the grace of God in the believer's life." I think it would be kind of childish for Laibach to directly refer to an American anti terrorism campaign. I don/t believe so. If all the people just spent a single bit of interest in Laibachs works, i would say - and yes i already lean critically outside the window, as the war against terrorism is a true christian crusade, the best way to refer to it was via the bible.
best regards,
Wolfgang Amadeus Mossad // Wertstahl.

Hi,
Your should inquire about the polnish futurist poet Aleksander Wat....
Yours
Anthony Brovarone, Lausanne, Switzerland